Page < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 >
Christian
Terrorists threaten to Kill Puri Shankaracharya
The
Church Outsourcing the murder?
***
Majority
Hindus are feeling prosecuted in a country like
India
Shankaracharya
of Puri Gobardhan Pitha, Jagadaguru Swami Nischalananda
Saraswati was on Wednesday apprehended that some
International forces have been working overtime to eliminate
Hindus and destroy their age-old culture to register their
dominancy in the country.
Gobardhan Peetha is one of the four important mutts of Hindu
faith in the country founded by Adi Sankaracharya.
Speaking at a press conference here, that the Hindu Seer, who
got a threat letter from the outlawed CPI (Maoists), however
indirectly attacking on Church said, "I
am not perturbed by the threat call issued by an outfit. I see
some others behind the nexus than the CPI (Maoists)."
"Majority
Hindus are feeling prosecuted in a country like India"

Shankaracharya
of Puri Swami Nischalananda Saraswati and Italian Catholic Sonia
Maino Gandhi and PM Manmohan Singh
Power tends
to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Minority
appeasement is the root cause of all existing problem in the
country. For vote bank politics, they could go to any
extent; the Seer charged referring to large-scale conversion
from Hinduism to Christianity.
The
Maoists never
interfere in religious activities. In the name of Maoists,
others are trying to defame the Hindu religion and kill me
Refer
to Religious
conversion is God’s work, but is it? -
By
Hilda Raja and This
Church is a Cruel Joke - By George Augustine. Watch
NDTV
& CNNIBN Defending Antinationals & Terrorists
and Watch
video The
Hunt for Soul - Conversion activities in India (In
Dutch and English). Refer to Amen
- an autobiography of a nun.
Refer
to Sex,
Priests, and Secret Codes: The Catholic Church’s 2000-year
Paper Trail of Sexual
Abuse - By
Thomas
Doyle, AW Richard Sipe & Patrick Wall
(LA:
Volt Press, 2006). Watch
An
Invasion through Conversion
- youtube.com.
Refer
to Survivors
Network of those Abused by Christian Priests.
Refer
to Amen
- an autobiography of a nun
and Mote
and the beam - By Sandhya Jain. Refer
to Murder
of Mahatma by the Church – By Ashok Sahu and Over
zealous crusader - By V Sundaram
***
The
outfit in a threat letter, that sent to the Gobardhan Pitha in
Puri, has alleged that the Hindu Seer has been spreading
communal feelings and dividing society on religious lines.
The Seer charged that Congress led UPA Government at Centre is
being patronizing anti-Hindu elements in the country. Prime
Minister Manmohan Singh and Congress
chief Sonia Gandhi have been making all out effort to
appease the minorities, he lambasted.
Minority appeasement is the root cause
of all existing problem in the country, he argued.
Christian
Crosses replaces 'Satyameva Jayatae' in Indian Coins

The
Central Government (UPA) has issued a new 10 Rupee Coin with a
‘Christian
crusader’s cross’
on side of the coin presented on the right above.
Refer
to Now
it is the turn of the 10 rupee coin!
***
"Majority Hindus are feeling
prosecuted in a country like
India
," he added. For vote bank politics, they could
go to any extent; the Seer charged referring to large-scale
conversion from Hinduism to Christianity.
Addressing
a new conference here on Wednesday, the Sankaracharaya said he
did not fear for his life. “I have received a number of
threatening letters. I don’t give importance to such
things,” he said, adding that he would continue to work for
uplift of the poor and preservation of Hinduism.
Sankaracharya
said he did not believe that the threat came from the Maoists. “They
never interfere in religious activities. In the name of Maoists,
others are trying to defame the Hindu religion and kill me,” he
said.uri Sankaracharya
(source: Puri
Seer lashes out at PM-Sonia, supports Orissa Bandh -
odishatoday.com). Refer to
Victims
of Christian Faith: How
many people have been killed by Christians since Biblical times?
Also
refer to The
Dark Side of Christian History - By Helen Ellerbe
***
Destroying
the social superstructure of India
The
Church's "harvest of soul" policy has led us to this
foul juncture
***
"The
Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of
moral progress in the world." - Bertrand
Russell
Did
the Church outsource the swami's assassination?
"Think
not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send
peace, but a sword." - Mathew
10:34
The
recent violence involving the church and locals in Orissa and
elsewhere has, it is said, sullied
India
's image abroad, put the Sangh parivar in a spot and evoked
global sympathy for the "hapless Christians", the
victims of those fascist Bajrang Dal goons.
The broad picture put out by the 'secular' media (Outlook
included) mirrors the position of the Church: the missionaries
only serve the underprivileged, they have no evangelical agenda.
The Manuvadi vested interests cannot stand the emancipation of
the hapless poor and hence resort to violence. In
short, the church's motives are pious and those of its opponents
devilish. Christianity came to
India
a few decades into its birth and remained undisturbed in the
subcontinent till about 500 years back. It's the arrival of the
missionaries—in the company of imperial forces—that
shattered the peace.
As Babasaheb Ambedkar
writes: "The entry of the Catholic Church in the field of
the spread of Christianity in
India
began in the year 1541 with the arrival of Francis Xavier. The
Syrian Christians shrank with dismay from the defiling touch of
the Roman Catholics of Portugal. The inquisitors of
Goa
discovered they were heretics and like a wolf in the fold, down
came the delegates of the Pope upon the Syrian Churches".
What followed was even worse.
Till the end of British rule, the missionaries were brazen about
their intent. Hindu gods were abused openly. Writing about his
childhood in
Rajkot
, Gandhiji says in his autobiography, "In those days,
Christian missionaries used to stand in a corner near the high
school and hold forth, pouring abuse on Hindus and their
Gods." Decades later, Gandhiji recalled in Young India
(March 4, 1926), "Though the preaching took place over
forty years ago, the painful memory of it is still vivid before
me." Obviously this practice was followed in the entire
British India
. If the "preaching" could leave such scars for so
long on a person like Gandhiji, how do you expect a tribal to
react to such humiliation?
Social reformers, from Dayanand
Saraswati to Vivekananda to Gandhiji, have questioned
the Church's 'real intent' and its methods at one time or
another. Gandhiji said, "I believe there is no such thing
as conversion from one faith to another in the accepted sense of
the term...Christian missions will render true service to India
if they can persuade themselves to confine their activities to
humanitarian service without the ulterior motive of converting
India or at least her unsophisticated villagers to Christianity,
and destroying their social superstructure" (Harijan, Sept
28, 1935). Note the words, "destroying the social
superstructure".
Refer to
Ireland
archbishop admits child abuse report 'will shock us all'
and
Refer
to Trans
World Radio-India compelling its employees to convert.
Post-Independence,
the Church changed its methods. Open confrontation
was dropped in favour of covert methods like inducements to
target groups (the poor, illiterate sections). The new strategy,
focused on specific areas, yielded a handsome harvest. A
comparison between the census figures of 1991 and 2001 shows the
growth rate of the Christian population was many times more that
of Hindus in as many as 18 of the 25 states and UTs. To carry
out the sordid business of harvesting of souls, the Church now
adopts a multi-layered strategy, full of prevarication and Janus-faced
subterfuge.
The church tells the elite it worships the Lord through the
service of the poor and has no conversion agenda. But at ground
level, there are overt attacks on other faiths. (The trouble in
Karnataka followed the publication of a booklet, Satyadarshini,
in which Hindu gods were abused). Protests against such insults
are termed as attacks on Christians. Again, the right to
evangelise is defended and exercised. 'Help' to the needy and
subsequent conversions are explained as a 'change of heart'.
It is against this backdrop that one has to see recent events.
The hapless Kandhamal tribals are under siege, fighting to
preserve their culture, even their very existence. The Kandhs,
once tribal kings, are now pariahs, hunted by the CRPF in their
own land, painted as rapists/ murderers. Thousands have fled to
the jungles. There is no one to speak for them. They
don't interest our rent-a-cause NGOs and activists. Arraigned
against the Kandh tribals are the missionaries with their
centuries of global experience in decimating local cultures.
Backed with foreign funds, the Church is following its age-old
divisive agenda of splitting local society into hostile
factions. At immense human cost, it has reaped a rich harvest of
souls. The share of Christians in the population of Kandhamal,
just six per cent in 1971, had grown to 18 per cent by '01.
Kandhamal has witnessed violence earlier too, in 1994 and in
2007. The recent blowout came after the murder of Swami
Laxmanananda Saraswati and his three associates. The Kandhs, 90
per cent of whom are Hindus, revered the aged swami. Over four
decades, he had not only started schools and hospitals for
them—in a sense, he helped them preserve their identity and
ancient faith against alien onslaughts. Who
killed the 84-year-old swami? Sabyasachi Panda, the Maoist
leader who owned up to the killing, said the swami was
eliminated for reviving Brahminism. Strangely, Panda turned a
blind eye to evangelism. But he divulged an interesting
fact—that the Christian Panas (an SC group) provides cadres to
the Maoists in Orissa. I for one don't know how to reconcile
evangelism, which believes in the harvesting of souls, with
Maoism, which believes there's no soul. In
Europe
, wherever Communism succeeded, the Church had to go
underground, if not disappear. But in Orissa, perhaps there is
some kind of 'strategic alliance' happening. Did
the Church outsource the swami's assassination?
It's all a
result of what Gandhiji called the destruction of the
"social superstructure".
India
is steeped in a pluralistic ethos and believes God is one,
irrespective of his numerous names and shapes. The Church has
faith only in "one God". The rest, to it, are false. Wouldn't
it be better if the church heeded Gandhiji's words and left
people to their faith?
(source: The
Church's "harvest of soul" policy has led us to this
foul juncture - By Balbir Punj). Refer to Biblical
Nonsense: A Review of the Bible for Doubting Christians - By
Jason Long and Why
I Rejected Christianity: A Former Apologist Explains - By
John W Loftus.
Top
of Page
It
happens only in
India
– By S.
L. Byrappa
The
USA
contributes USD 145 Billion every year to fund Christian
Missionaries across the world.
Christian
Evangelists, NGOs and INGOs hate anyone or anything being
nationalistic.
***
For
the last four decades, Christian missionaries in
India
have been indulging in religious conversions and this trend has
become fairly aggressive and far more pronounced with Sonia
Gandhi’s coronation.
However,
the mass media have chosen to ignore reporting this. States like
Orissa and Karnataka have reacted sharply to the scale of
operations of Christian missionaries. This has been dutifully
reported by all newspapers and TV channels across
India
. Self-proclaimed ‘Secularists’ and Left parties have taken
this opportunity to announce that
India
has met its doom in this backlash and have thereby supported the
missionaries! It is certainly a pity that they do not care to
recognise that the common man on the street clearly understands
what the truth is. Sonia Gandhi’s sycophants, self-proclaimed
intellectuals and secularists have gone to the extent of blaming
pro-Hindu organisations, Seers and BJP governments for the
situation and are helping Christian organisations bent on
getting
India
censured at the international level by United Nations and other
such organisations.
The
Indian media, especially English TV channels and newspapers
celebrated The Pope’s visit to India.
Also
refer to Church
in Kerala is rocked by sex scandals – By George Iype in
Kochi
and Clergy
abuse. Refer
to Amen
- an autobiography of a nun
and Mote
and the beam - By Sandhya Jain.
The
Indian Government accorded hospitality reserved for heads of
states to The Pope, who is the religious head of Roman
Catholics. The President, The Prime Minister and the cabinet
queued up to pay obeisance to him. A few pro-Hindu organisations
argued that he is a religious head and his sole mission to
India
was to encourage conversions and therefore he should neither be
allowed to enter
India
nor be accorded official welcome. These opinions were dismissed
as Hindu-fundamentalist diatribes by the self-proclaimed
modernists and the English media. And what did the Pope do? He
proclaimed with exaltation: “Just as we planted the cross in
Europe in the first millennium and in the
Americas
and Africa in the second millennium, we shall harvest the crop
of our faith in this powerful continent (
Asia
) in the third millennium”. He did not bother to hide his true
intentions. However, the media and the self-proclaimed
Secularists who branded Hindu groups as fundamentalists chose to
maintain clever silence over this proclamation.
The
following list details the present population (percentage) of
Christians (in countries that had previously been untouched by
Christianity) due to the wide-spread activity of Christian
missionaries: Angola (90%), Burundi (78%), Cameroon (35%),
Central African Republic (82%), Chad (33%), Congo (62%), East
Timor (98%), Ethiopia (52%), Equatorial Guinea (94%), Gabon
(79%), Kenya (25%), Liberia (68%), Mozambique (31%), Nigeria
(52%), Papua New Guinea (97%), Philippines (84%), Rwanda (69%),
South Africa (78%), South Korea (49%), Sudan (30%), Tanzania
(20%), Togo (23%), Uganda (70%) and Zaire (90%).
The
USA
contributes USD 145 Billion every year to fund Christian
Missionaries across the world. Churches across the world spend
USD 1.1 Billion towards research aimed at achieving religious
conversions. This is for propaganda material in 300 languages
about 180 topics. Books and articles are printed in 500
languages. They total 175000. Every conversion costs USD 3300.
It does not mean that this amount reaches the Convert. It is the
expense incurred in activities related to administration,
planning and implementation of the conversion programme. In 1500
A.D, there were 30 Lac active Christian Missionaries. Their
number stands at 64.8 Crore today. 54% of these people are
non-Whites. The strategy is to train non-Whites, provide them
with funds and involve them in religious conversions.
This
is similar to the time when the British employed Indians as
Soldiers to rule
India
!
What
brand of spiritual enlightenment is this? This is an
issue that Indians do not understand. That is perhaps because
Indians relate spiritual enlightenment to things like living in
a hermitage in a forest or in caves in mountains or perhaps in
the freezing heights of Snowy Himalayas where people manage to
look inward. One cannot preach others until one is enlightened.
And what would one preach about? To look inward! To understand
oneself! Religion is a form of this enlightenment. Preaching it
is called jigyasa. However, this isn’t the essence or method
of Christianity.

The
Bible-derived creeds are founded on a central figure (Jehovah,
God, Allah or History) who commands the exclusive and overriding
allegiance of the believers.
He
is jealous, cruel and brooks no rival.
To
equate or identify Him (e.g. Allah) with gods worshipped by
people of other faiths (e.g. Rama or God of the Bible) is to
insult him by denying his supremacy.
Refer to Religious
conflict: Tracing the roots
- By Virendra Parekh -
vijayvaani.com.
Refer
to A
Perception of Christian Missionary Activities – By Suresh
Desai. Refer
to South
Asian Terrorism: All Roads Lead to the
British Empire
-
By Ramtanu Maitra -
vijayvaani.com.
Refer
to Religious
conversion is God’s work, but is it? -
By
Hilda Raja and This
Church is a Cruel Joke - By George Augustine.
Refer
to Christian
Saints for Sale - By C I Isaac - vijayvaani.com.
Refer
to Thousands
beaten, raped in Irish reform schools and
Terror
behind locked door
(image
source: toomanytribbles.blogspot.com).
***
To understand Christianity, we need to learn the features of
Semitic religions. They are also called Prophetic religions. It
means that these religions were established by a prophet each.
The roots lie in the Jewish religion established by Prophet
Abraham. Christianity, established by Jesus Christ, is a
modified form of Judaism. Later, Prophet Mohammed established
Islam borrowing various tenets of Abraham’s Judaism. The
message common to these religions is that
‘God
is not directly accessible to
Man.
You are, fundamentally, Sinners. God is exceptionally terrible
and cruel and punishes without qualms. You will have to believe
me, your Messiah, and follow my preaching to obtain an
opportunity to avoid burning in hell. If you do not pay heed,
you are sure to end up in hell. You will have to place faith in
this religion. You will have to convert others to this faith.
You will have to spread this message and convert people wherever
you go, even if it necessitates the use of force. That is
Religion; that is the code.’
(source: It
happens only in
India
– By S.
L. Byrappa
and translated by Manoj Despande). Refer
to Sex,
Priests, and Secret Codes: The Catholic Church’s 2000-year
Paper Trail of Sexual
Abuse
- By
Thomas
Doyle, AW Richard Sipe & Patrick Wall
(LA:
Volt Press, 2006).Watch
video The
Hunt for Soul - Conversion activities in India (In
Dutch and English). Ex-nun's
confessions set to rock
Kerala
Church.
Also refer to Church
in Kerala is rocked by sex scandals – By George Iype in
Kochi
and Clergy
abuse
The
Suppression of African Spirituality
My
name was stolen from me 400 years ago when my people were stolen
out of
Africa
. They were sold into slavery in
America
, “the land of the free and the home of the brave.”My name
was taken from me when my ancestors were forbidden to utter its
sound or pass it on to their children. When Christopher Columbus
invaded the shores of
America
in 1492, he brought with him diseases that would kill over 70%
of the Native American people within three years. Whole tribes
disappeared from the face of the earth. In
the name of their Christian god,
the slave owners reasoned that Africans needed to be brought to
America
so they could be civilized. African slaves were considered
savges in need of conversion. My culture, my religion, my
ancestors, traditions, customs, stolen, suppressed, violated,
vilified, denied, destroyed – that is what I call terrorism.
(source:
A
Drum & A Dream The Suppression of African Spirituality
during Slavery in the
US - By Dorothy
Randall Gray).
Western Hypocrisy: Stop
trying 'save' Africa
It
seems that these days, wracked by guilt at the humanitarian
crisis it has created in the Middle East, the West has turned to
Africa
for redemption. Idealistic college students, celebrities such as
Bob Geldof and politicians such as Tony Blair have all made
bringing light to the dark continent their mission. They fly in
for internships and fact-finding missions or to pick
out children to adopt in much the same way my friends and I in
New York
take the subway to the pound to adopt stray dogs.
Perhaps most
interesting is the language used to describe the
Africa
being saved. For example, the Keep a Child Alive/" I am
African" ad campaign features portraits of primarily white,
Western celebrities with painted "tribal markings" on
their faces above "I AM AFRICAN" in bold letters.
Below, smaller print says, "help us stop the dying."Such
campaigns, however well intentioned, promote the stereotype of
Africa
as a black hole of disease and death. News reports constantly
focus on the continent's corrupt leaders, warlords,
"tribal" conflicts, child laborers, and women
disfigured by abuse and genital mutilation. These descriptions run under headlines like "Can Bono Save
Africa?" or "Will Brangelina Save Africa?"
The relationship between the West and Africa is no longer based
on openly racist beliefs, but such articles are reminiscent of
reports from the heyday of European
colonialism, when missionaries were sent to
Africa
to introduce us to education, Jesus Christ and
"civilization."...
(source:
Stop
trying 'save' Africa - By
Uzodinma Iweala).
Top
of Page
Pushing
Hindus into a corner
"
India
is the only
country in the world which has opened its arms to all religions
and all people and thus become the cradle of world religions.
Fringe Christian churches have been misusing Freedom of Religion
for proselytizing, poaching on other churches as well, and
creating social tensions. One is not judged by one’s religion,
but will be judged by the measure of love one has lived with and
the Truth one has upheld."
- Hilda
Raja
-
Professor
from Stella Maris College - UNCIRF
– will it visit convents where nuns are raped?
Refer
to Thousands
beaten, raped in Irish reform schools and
Terror
behind locked door
***
One Diwali the
highly revered monk of Hindus, Swami
Jayendra Saraswati, was arrested while performing
puja. The secular world celebrated it
as a victory of law and constitutional propriety.
When nothing was proved, all the chargesheets turned bunkum, the
Supreme Court gave a verdict
favouring the swami's
release on bail, but no one retracted the strong, often
abusive words used for the Hindu monk. It was met with silence
as if nothing important had happened.
Kali
Yuga: The
disadvantaged Hindus, pampered Minorities
of India
India
’s putrid political dispensation, sham-secularist politicians
take sadistic pleasure in heaping scorn and calumny on the
religious icons of the majority community, namely the Hindus.

One Diwali the highly revered monk of Hindus,
Swami Jayendra Saraswati, was arrested while performing puja.
The secular world celebrated it as a victory of
law and constitutional propriety. When nothing was proved, all the charge sheets
turned bunkum, the Supreme Court gave a verdict favouring the
swami's release on bail, but no one retracted the strong, often
abusive words used for the Hindu monk. It was met with silence
as if nothing important had happened.
India
's Hinduness is that essential element to define this nation. We can't be
explained through Saudis, Marx or
Bethlehem. Or through Arabic or Latin or Persian.
India
is explained by the Ganga,
Krishna
, Ram and Gandhi. By Kumbh Mela, Sanskrit chanting, lighting of
the lamp, Namaste, the Vedas, Guru Nanak's teachings, Guru
Gobind Singh's valour, Buddha's global message of peace and
compassion and Mahavir's ahimsa.
India
is deciphered by Dhammapad, the Gita, the Guru Granth
Sahib and a divine love that saw the emergence of Radha and
Meera. That fired the imaginations of doyens like
Tagore and Vivekananda.
Watch
The
Truth about our "Secular" Indian Media.
Watch
video The
Hunt for Soul - Conversion activities in India (In
Dutch and English).
***
One
Krishna Janmashtami night,
another ochre-robed reformist monk, Swami
Lakshmanananda, was murdered along with an aged Hindu
nun, Ma Bhaktimoyee, in his ashram. Secularists tried to direct
and guide the entire investigation till the arrested murderers
confessed that swami's work among tribals made prosylitisation
difficult and hence they took the violent way. The media linked
the violence post-Lakshmanananda's murder to various Hindu
organisations and completely ignored the brutal killing of the
sanyasi and the lady monk. This
Diwali, Hindus were labelled as 'terrorists'.
India
's
Hinduness is
that essential element to define this nation. We can't be
explained through Saudis, Marx or
Bethlehem
.
Or through Arabic or Latin or Persian.
India
is explained by the Ganga,
Krishna
, Ram and Gandhi. By Kumbh Mela, Sanskrit chanting, lighting of
the lamp, Namaste, the Vedas, Guru Nanak's teachings, Guru
Gobind Singh's valour, Buddha's global message of peace and
compassion and Mahavir's ahimsa.
India
is deciphered by Dhammapad, the Gita, the Guru Granth
Sahib and a divine love that saw the emergence of Radha and
Meera. That fired the imaginations of doyens like
Tagore and Vivekananda. Together they make a mutually supportive
group of Indian streams of faith that welcomed and accommodated
without murmur all other ways of worship brought here through
various means. Every
single persecuted community in the world found a respectable
space here, while they were brutalised,
uprooted, converted and 'museum-ised' in other countries. The
legacy of tolerance and plurality is the legacy of the Hindus
and all those faiths born and flowered here. It
made Taj Mahal possible and Jesus adored by a non-Christian
majority. You deny them this place of honour, make them shrink
in a defensive shell, and you lose India.
One
Krishna Janmashtami night, another ochre-robed reformist monk,
Swami Lakshmanananda, was murdered along with an aged Hindu nun,
Ma Bhaktimoyee, in his ashram.
Secularists
tried to direct and guide the entire investigation till the
arrested murderers confessed that swami's work among tribals
made prosylitisation difficult and hence they took the violent
way. The media linked the violence post-Lakshmanananda's murder
to various Hindu organisations and completely ignored the brutal
killing of the sanyasi and the lady monk.
"The
ideology of Indian secularism, misconceived from the very
outset, has become the backbone of Islamic Jihad and
fundamentalist evangelism. The one committing mass murder, the
other attempting to transform
India
’s cultural and political landscape in order to re-impose
foreign rule over it. And always to the chorus of minority
rights, cynically guaranteed by Indian secularism."
***
Ram
Sethu becomes a target of destruction, Ram is denied,
Ram's history linked with the bridge is mocked at, Sita's
persona is caricaturized in public, the shrinking Hindu
population and their conversion become victory signposts of the
secularists, Hindus driven out of Kashmir are deleted from all
lists of secular concern, Hindu temples are taken over by the
atheist State and their revenue used on non-Hindu areas, while
not a single non-Hindu place of worship is taken over or
'managed' on similar grounds by the governors! More than sixty
thousand Hindus have been killed by terrorists in various
actions during the last three decades, five lakh have been
uprooted and turned refugees, but no one shares their grief or
respects their courage, but terms them terrorist in a matter of
24 hours, that too relying on media hype and an election
platform?
After centuries Hindus got freedom that should have
meant a free space for them to flower their culture, language
and traditions. After all, the invaders came to attack and loot
them and raze their temples. Wasn't it a matter of logical right
that they should have been honoured for exemplary resistance and
resilience and showing an extraordinary tolerance towards all
those communities whose leaders had been in the forefront to
deprive them of basic human rights? But instead, the
victims were portrayed
as aggressors and humiliated for their colour and faith. What
has changed since Ghauris and Ghaznavis and the inquisitionist
Portuguese left?
They
killed us but never portrayed Hindus as terrorists. This secular
dispensation is celebrating Diwali with that label gifted to
Hindus. It will not remain unanswered. Hindus as a mainline
faith never never never believed in any kind of cowardice that's
the hallmark of terrorism we see today. Killing innocents,
shooting at fellow citizens and the dreaded midnight knocks just
for the reason they wear a different faith.
But
I am afraid the secular hate-mongers
are pushing Hindus into a difficult corner without a
space to be heard. Not a single 'mainline' newspaper publishes
their views, though any number of assaults on them are a matter
of routine. This is creating a grave situation and it's a
warning signal that can be ignored only at the peril of the
nation's great legacy of plurality.
(source:
Pushing
Hindus into a corner
-
By Tarun
Vijay is
a director of the Dr
Syama Prasad Mookerjee Research Foundation - rediff.com).
Top
of Page
Is
Christianity a solid monolith?
"Caste" was an old weapon of missionaries who
established the conversion business in
India
***
In
India
every debate on conversion to Christianity ends with Hindu
society's caste-based "poison
of divisions". Missionaries and their
supporters present conversion as the only "antidote"
available. And missionaries are "doctors,"
hell bent on administering that antidote! And our
"secularists" have been repeating it.
"Caste" was an old weapon of
missionaries who established the conversion business in
India
.
Anti-Brahminism,
"Dravidianism," conversion as "the
solution" to caste and the Aryan-Dravidian
divide were effectively introduced as stratagems for
conversion by Bishop Robert Caldwell.
"On the other hand",
he wrote, "Christianity teaches that God gave us life and
continually preserves us. He is therefore our Father in
heaven… The Brotherhood of man follows Fatherhood of God…
But Hinduism makes life a curse instead of a blessing" (p.
20-21).
Caldwell
’s arguments are well known. His "Dravidian
Grammar" was a trend-setter. But why did he
painstakingly write so many books? If we read his lecture,
"Progress of Christianity in India" we get the answer.
He says, "an encouraging
amount of interest in the progress of Christianity has now at
last been awakened, and a demand for information has been
excited: it is now felt that a great door and effectual has been
opened to us in India, and that the conversion of India to
Christ is one of the greatest works, if not the great work, to
which the Church and nation of England are called" (Lectures on the Tinnevelly Missions, 1857, p. 4).
Refer
to chapter on Aryan
Invasion Theory
For sheer audacity and bigotry,
Caldwell
could today be called a "cultural
terrorist". Yet his views are endorsed by a
section of
India
's "secular" intelligentsia! They were reiterated in
Karnataka's recent public debate on conversion.
The debate on conversion was launched by the oldest Kannada
daily, Samyukta
Karnataka, with some well-researched articles
by selected writers and scholars. Professional missionaries kept
silent; our secularists did all the batting on their behalf!
Once again, leftists are proving that they are "more
Christian" than the original faith-sellers. Hindus
should not hesitate to debate caste as they have nothing to
hide. But they should understand what Christianity is all
about. They should study and debate its history and
methods of expansion, its "spiritualism" and
"brotherhood." They should ask
missionaries why casteless societies were converted to
Christianity throughout the ages and throughout the world.
Missionaries'
typical answers are well known. In
India
, "conversion is the best
solution for caste-based differences within Hindu society;"
in
America
, "barbaric
tribes had to be civilized and spiritualized."
They always proffer local issues to justify conversions. In
India
's case, most proponents of Christianity's "monolithic
unity" and Hinduism’s "caste-
based divisions" invoke B.R. Ambedkar to remain
politically correct while attacking the faith!
But
all fail to explain why Ambedkar did not convert to
Caldwell
's "great brotherhood"
called Christianity.
In fact, Ambedkar
wanted to send a strong message through his religious conversion.
After examining Christianity, he wrote in 1938: "caste governs the life of Christians as much as it does the life of the
Hindus. There are Brahmin Christians and non-Brahmin Christians.
Among non-Brahmin Christians there are Maratha Christians, Mahar
Christians, Mang Christians and Bhangi Christians. Similarly in
the south there are Pariah Christians, Malla Christians and
Madiga Christians. They would not inter-marry. They would not
inter-dine" (Selected Speeches and Writings, Vol. 5,
Government of Maharashtra, 1989, p. 445-78).
Ambedkar converted to Buddhism as it was a "part and parcel of Bharatiya culture." He said: "I
have taken care that my conversion will not harm the tradition
of the culture and the history of this land" (Quoted
in 'Ambedkar', by
Dhananjay Keer, p. 498). The hard truth is that even
Buddhism is not a monolithic unity! It has different schools of
thought and different traditional streams. For that matter where
do we find the most unified, rock-solid group on earth? Is Islam
one single entity?
Is
Christianity a superb monolith? If so,
since when? Since its inception or through
"spiritualism"? Since the First Council of Nicaea,
when Emperor Constantine decided, at sword-point, what should
and should not be the tenets of 'official' Christianity? Or
since the Second Vatican Council, when it was decided to
establish the supremacy of Catholicism once
again? Christians are not one; they are divided into
separate churches and traditions. Over the centuries,
Christianity has divided into numerous denominations. Each
denomination has its own distinctive beliefs or practices, yet
we hold them to be branches of the same religion. But when it
comes to Hindu society, every Tom, Dick or Harry talks about
caste and asks us "where is the common unity?" as if
there is no common thread of beliefs among Hindus!
Although
missionaries never talk about their internal divisions openly,
conversion always happens to a particular denomination, to a
particular church. One can never get converted to
"Christianity". He or she can only become a member of
a particular church. When former British
Prime Minister Tony Blair converted to the Roman
Catholic Church, the Anglican community and its church
vehemently protested.
Why do street missionaries never talk about their internal
divisions? This is an age-old strategy. The famous Christian
apologist, C.S. Lewis (1898
- 1963) who
wrote Mere
Christianity, in 1940s, reminded believers
about this strategy: "our
divisions should never be discussed except in the presence of
those who have already come to believe that there is one God and
that Jesus Christ is his only Son"!
Let us
move on to the denominations. In 1985, it was estimated that
there were 22,000 Christian denominations with 5 new ones being
formed each week! There are nearly 34,000 (probably more)
Christian and Messianic denominations and churches in the world
now. These may be broken down to six different main blocks:
1] Independents 22000
2] Protestants
9000
3] 'Marginals'
1600
4] Orthodox
781
5] Roman Catholics 242
6] Anglicans
168
Total
33791
(source:
World Christian Encyclopedia, by Barrett, Kurian, Johnson;
Oxford
Univ.
Press, 2nd edition, 2001, Vol. 1, p.16-18).
Pope
John Paul II once called Protestant missionaries "rapacious
wolves" for converting Catholics! So much for "monolithic
unity"! In
the second week of August 2007, Roman Catholics, Protestants,
Methodists, Pentecostals, Orthodox, Evangelicals (sounds like
caste names!) gathered to map a "common religious
conversion code" in
France
. The code, which has to be finalized in a year or two, was
named "Ethical Conversion Code".
"Conversion is a
controversial issue not only in inter-religious relations, but
in intra-Christian relations as well," admitted Dr.
Hans Ucko, World Council of Churches programme
executive and one of the organizers of the meeting.
So much for "monolithic
unity" and "great
brotherhood"!
(source: Castes
and Conversions: Is Christianity a solid monolith? -
By G. Anil Kumar).
Top
of Page
Page < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 >
|